Lgb 男同

International Travel

Travelers can face distinct challenges abroad based on their real or perceived sexual orientation. Laws and attitudes in some countries may affect safety and ease of travel.

More than 60 countries consider consensual same-sex relations a crime. In some of these countries, people who involve in consensual same-sex relations may face severe punishment. Many countries do not acknowledge same-sex marriage.

Research your destination before you travel 

Review the explore advisory and destination communication page of the place you plan to attend. Check the Local Laws & Customs section.  This has information specific to travelers who may be targeted by discrimination or violence on the basis of sexual orientation.

Many countries only recognize male and female sex markers in passports. They undertake not have IT systems at ports of entry that can accept other sex markers, including valid U.S. passports with an X sex marker. If traveling with a valid U.S. passport with an X sex marker, examine the immigration regulations for your destination as acceptance can vary by country.

Bring important documents 

Bring copies of important documents. This is es

Lesbian, gay, bisexual communities more at-risk for dementia, study finds

Lesbian, gay and double attraction — or LGB — people are more vulnerable to one of the fastest-growing health concerns in the country: dementia, according to new research from Michigan State University.

“Our study speaks to the unaddressed questions about whether members the LGB collective are more likely to develop cognitive impairment at older ages and, if so, what factors contribute to their poorer cognitive health, ” said Ning Hsieh, an assistant professor of sociology at MSU and lead author of the study published in the journal, The Gerontologist.

“We knew that stress and depression are peril factors for many chronic health problems, including cognitive impairment, in later experience. LGB people trial more stressful events and have higher rates of depression compared to their heterosexual counterparts,” she said.

Analyzing the elevated cognitive health risks among older members of the LGB community, the examine was the first to use a national sample and screening tool to gauge cognitive health disparities between LGB and heterosexual older adults.

Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual (LGB) peoples' leadership self-effectiveness: The roles of internalized sexual stigma, LGB positive identity, and traditional masculinity

Introduction

Despite numerous institutional interventions that aim to prevent sexual orientation and gender identity stigmatization and discrimination recently, it is a well-known reality that LGBTQ+ employees still experience an unequal workplace experience in practice (Mara et al., 2021; Ozbilgin et al., 2022). One of the leading discriminations LGBTQ+ employees face in practice is the “gay glass ceiling effect” in which they report improved managerial authority and supervisory skills, but they are not qualified to attain top managerial positions and even get paid less when compared to heterosexual individuals. Even though LGBTQ+ individuals are more likely to have a longer formal education, they care for to only reach low payment managerial positions because of discrimination, not rather than their diverse skills or characteristics (Aksoy et al., 2019). Eventually, many LGBTQ+ individuals might feel discouraged when they comprehend emerging as a leader is a challenging

Lesbian, Gay, and Multi-attracted Supervisees' Experiences of LGB-Affirmative and Non-Affirmative Supervision in COAMFTE-Accredited Training Programs

Date of Completion

5-10-2013

Keywords

LGB affirmative coaching, marriage and family therapy supervision

Major Advisor

Sandra A. Rigazio-DiGilio, Ph.D.

Associate Advisor

Rona Preli, Ph.D.

Associate Advisor

Robert Ryder, Ph.D.

Field of Study

Human Progress and Family Studies

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy

Abstract

This learn is a replication of Burkard, Knox, Hess, and Schultz’s (2009) study of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) affirmative and non-affirmative supervision. Using a consensual qualitative research (CQR) design as described by Hill et al. (1997, 2005), LGB supervisees from COAMFTE-accredited master’s and doctoral programs were interviewed regarding their experiences of LGB-affirmative and non-affirmative supervision. Supervisees were asked to describe a LGB-affirmative event and a LGB-non-affirmative event from their past or current individual or group supervision. Supervisees were asked the ways in which these events affected their personal and professional progress, the supervisory relat